MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403353460 · doi:10.1504/ijaitg.2024.142185

The mango value chain in Haiti: constraints and opportunities of a promising industry

2024· article· en· W4403353460 on OpenAlexaff
Magdalee Brunache

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Agriculture Innovation Technology and Globalisation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsCanada Research Chairs
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue (mathematics)BusinessChain (unit)Value chainNatural resource economicsIndustrial organizationEconomicsSupply chainComputer scienceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mango plays a vital role in Haiti, ranking as the second-largest export crop. However, despite a staggering number of mango varieties cultivated in the country, only the Francique variety is suitable for export, primarily to the USA. This paper, driven by desk research and using the value chain approach and an adjusted Porter's diamond model, offers a comprehensive review of the Haitian mango value chain, aiming to pinpoint constraints and opportunities for optimising gains, minimising losses, and bolstering competitiveness in this promising but highly vulnerable industry. Challenges include the scarcity of commercial orchards, tensions among stakeholders, limited coordination along the chain, and inadequate access to credit for producers. Furthermore, marketing remains dependent on traditional modes of transportation, such as donkeys and human-powered transportation, causing important rates of damage and rejection. Recommendations for upgrading the value chain are proposed, along with suggested actions for government agencies and other relevant organisations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Agriculture Innovation Technology and GlobalisationSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207