MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403361236 · doi:10.1101/2024.10.10.617546

TENM4 is an essential transduction component for touch

2024· preprint· en· W4403361236 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed A. Khallaf, Angela Tzu-Lun Huang, Letizia Dalmasso, Sampurna Chakrabarti, Rowena Groeneveld, Yinth Andrea Bernal Sierra, Jonathan Alexis Garcia-Contreras, Anja Schütz, Valérie Bégay, Sarah Hedtrich, Wei Zhong, Oliver Popp, Philipp Mertins, Gary R. Lewin

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsComponent (thermodynamics)Transduction (biophysics)NeurosciencePsychologyMedicineCommunicationBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Gentle touch is conveyed to the brain by fast-conducting sensory fibers. Mechanosensitive ion channels at the terminals of these neurons are thought to be gated by extracellular tethers that transmit force from the surrounding matrix to the channel complex, but the molecular identity of such tethers has remained unknown. Here, we identify Teneurin-4 (TENM4) as an essential extracellular linker protein for mechanotransduction in mechanoreceptors. Sensory neuron–specific deletion of Tenm4 in mice caused profound touch insensitivity, while acute and reversible proteolytic disassembly of TENM4 at sensory endings confirmed its direct role in force transduction. Ultrastructural analyses revealed TENM4 localization to filamentous structures at the neurite–laminin interface, defining it as a structural component of the mechanosensory tether. These findings identify TENM4 as a core element of fast somatic sensation and provide molecular insight into how extracellular forces are coupled to ion channel activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicErythrocyte Function and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207