Proteomic and metabolomic profiles of plasma-derived Extracellular Vesicles differentiate melanoma patients from healthy controls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Plasma-derived Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) from patients with melanoma have similar size and concentration compared to those from healthy controls. • Proteins linked to melanoma development (PRG4, APOC4, SERPIND1, VWF, TNC and PLG) were identified in the plasma-derived EVs of patients with melanoma. • Metabolomic analysis revealed alterations in phosphatidylcholines in the plasma-derived EVs of patients with melanoma, although their definitive role is unclear. Plasma-derived Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) have been suggested as novel biomarkers in melanoma, due to their ability to reflect the cell of origin and ease of collection. This study aimed to identify novel EV biomarkers that can discriminate between disease stages. This was achieved by characterising the plasma-derived EVs of patients with melanoma, and comparing their proteomic and metabolomic profile to those from healthy controls. EVs were isolated from the plasma of 36 patients with melanoma and 13 healthy controls using Size Exclusion Chromatography. Proteomic and Metabolomic Analyses were performed, and machine learning algorithms were used to identify potential proteins and metabolites to differentiate the plasma-derived EVs from melanoma patients of different disease stages. The concentration and size of the EV population isolated was similar between groups. Proteins (APOC4, PRG4, PLG, TNC, VWF and SERPIND1) and metabolites (lyso PC a C18:2, PC ae C44:3) previously associated with melanoma pathogenesis were identified as relevant in differentiating between disease stages. The results further support the continued investigation of circulating plasma-derived EVs as biomarkers in melanoma. Furthermore, the potential of combined proteo-metabolomic signatures for differentiation between disease stages may provide valuable insights into early detection, prognosis, and personalised treatment strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".