MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403377609 · doi:10.1177/14613484241279542

Smart whole-body vibration attenuation, cushion for heavy equipment seating: Model and simulation

2024· article· en· W4403377609 on OpenAlexafffund
A. C. Barrie, Megan E. Govers, Janik Habegger, Marwan Hassan, Michele Oliver

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of low frequency noise, vibration and active control · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Vibration on Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCushionAttenuationWhole body vibrationVibrationEngineeringAcousticsStructural engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Off-road mobile machine operators are exposed to whole-body vibration (WBV) which can result in adverse health effects. Seat suspensions are used to reduce WBV exposure, but typical passive seats cannot attenuate frequencies below 1.13 Hz. The proposed device is designed to minimize transmissibility from 0 to 20 Hz because this bandwidth contains the dominant frequency for most off-road vehicles. The semi-active smart device uses bang-bang control and is designed to be installed in place of the seat-pan cushion in OEM passive seats. Modelled as a two degree of freedom system, simulations were performed using a lumped mass model (ω n = 3 Hz; sinusoidal base excitation 0-20 Hz). Using a hexapod robot, a prototype reduced transmissibility compared to a passive OEM seat. The device was up to 5 times more effective than a passive seat in reducing vibration transmissibility. Simulations revealed that operator mass and seat stiffness variations have little effect on device WBV attenuation performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of low frequency noise, vibration and active controlSame topicEffects of Vibration on HealthFrench-language works237,207