Advancing Progressive Web Applications to Leverage Medical Imaging for Visualization of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine and Multiplanar Reconstruction: Software Development and Validation Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In medical imaging, 3D visualization is vital for displaying volumetric organs, enhancing diagnosis and analysis. Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) improves visual and diagnostic capabilities by transforming 2D images from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging into 3D representations. Web-based Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) viewers integrated into picture archiving and communication systems facilitate access to pictures and interaction with remote data. However, the adoption of progressive web applications (PWAs) for web-based DICOM and MPR visualization remains limited. This paper addresses this gap by leveraging PWAs for their offline access and enhanced performance. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the integration of DICOM and MPR visualization into the web using PWAs, addressing challenges related to cross-platform compatibility, integration capabilities, and high-resolution image reconstruction for medical image visualization. METHODS: Our paper introduces a PWA that uses a modular design for enhancing DICOM and MPR visualization in web-based medical imaging. By integrating React.js and Cornerstone.js, the application offers seamless DICOM image processing, ensures cross-browser compatibility, and delivers a responsive user experience across multiple devices. It uses advanced interpolation techniques to make volume reconstructions more accurate. This makes MPR analysis and visualization better in a web environment, thus promising a substantial advance in medical imaging analysis. RESULTS: In our approach, the performance of DICOM- and MPR-based PWAs for medical image visualization and reconstruction was evaluated through comprehensive experiments. The application excelled in terms of loading time and volume reconstruction, particularly in Google Chrome, whereas Firefox showed superior performance in viewing slices. This study uses a dataset comprising 22 CT scans of peripheral artery patients to demonstrate the application's robust performance, with Google Chrome outperforming other browsers in both the local area network and wide area network settings. In addition, the application's accuracy in MPR reconstructions was validated with an error margin of <0.05 mm and outperformed the state-of-the-art methods by 84% to 98% in loading and volume rendering time. CONCLUSIONS: This paper highlights advancements in DICOM and MPR visualization using PWAs, addressing the gaps in web-based medical imaging. By exploiting PWA features such as offline access and improved performance, we have significantly advanced medical imaging technology, focusing on cross-platform compatibility, integration efficiency, and speed. Our application outperforms existing platforms for handling complex MPR analyses and accurate analysis of medical imaging as validated through peripheral artery CT imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".