MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403382047 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03239

Investigation of CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction to Formate in an Industrial-Scale Electrochemical Cell through Transient Numerical Modeling

2024· article· en· W4403382047 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Bahreini, Martin Désilets, Ergys Pahija, Ulrich Legrand, Jiaxun Guo, Arthur G. Fink

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsElectrochemistryFormateTransient (computer programming)Reduction (mathematics)Scale (ratio)ChemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Environmental scienceElectrodeComputer sciencePhysical chemistryEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysicsEngineeringCatalysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) are promising for scaling up industrial CO 2 electrochemical reduction cells. This study introduces a transient numerical model representing an industrial electrolyzer. The model incorporates electrochemical kinetics, homogeneous reaction kinetics, and transport phenomena within the cathode compartment. By integrating a global mass balance over the entire electrolyte, it analyzes time-dependent performance variations such as Faradaic efficiency (FE). This allows us to simulate formate production and understand mass transport limitations within the GDE. Our results demonstrated a 4% increase in FE when the electrolyte flow rate was increased from 120 to 360 mL/min. However, further increasing the flow rate to 830 mL/min showed diminishing returns. Additionally, increasing the KOH concentration in the catholyte from 0.5 to 1 M resulted in a 7–10% increase in FE. A slight further increase was observed when increasing from 3 to 4 M. This analysis provides valuable insights into optimizing electrochemical reduction processes at an industrial scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207