MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403390083 · doi:10.1101/2024.10.12.24315379

Lifetime Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Against Mozambican Women: Individual and Contextual Level Factors Driving Its Prevalence

2024· preprint· en· W4403390083 on OpenAlexaff
Maud Z Muosieyiri, Nazeem Muhajarine

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomestic violencePsychologyIntimate partnerHuman factors and ergonomicsDemographyEnvironmental healthPoison controlMedicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a significant public health issue in Mozambique. This study uses data from the 2022-2023 Mozambique Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) to examine the prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of Lifetime IPV among women. Methods A nationally representative sample of 4,813 women aged 15-49 was analyzed to assess the prevalence of Lifetime IPV. Logistic regression models were used to identify individual- and contextual-level factors associated with Lifetime IPV. Results Nearly 1 in 4 women (23.07%) reported experiencing physical abuse from a current or former partner in their lifetime. Marital status emerged as a key individual-level determinant, with married, cohabitating, and separated women being at significantly higher odds of experiencing IPV compared to women who had never been in a union. Educational attainment and current employment were also associated with increased odds of IPV. Similarly, women who justified physical abuse had higher odds of experiencing IPV. Additionally, husbands/partners’ alcohol consumption was one of the strongest predictors, nearly tripling the odds of Lifetime IPV. Finally, the effect modification between marital status and education showed that the intersection of these factors further shaped IPV risk. At the contextual level, provincial disparities were observed, with Cabo Delgado and Manica showing the highest IPV prevalence, while Inhambane and Gaza had the lowest. Conclusion This study provides updated data on the prevalence of Lifetime IPV in Mozambique and highlights key individual and contextual factors contributing to IPV. The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions addressing socio-cultural norms, improving educational opportunities, mitigating alcohol consumption, and implementing province-specific strategies to reduce IPV and enhance women’s safety across Mozambique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicIntimate Partner and Family Violence→French-language works237,207→