Monarch: Monitoring Architecture for 5G and Beyond Network Slices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data-driven algorithms play a pivotal role in the automated orchestration and management of network slices in 5G and beyond networks, however, their efficacy hinges on the timely and accurate monitoring of the network and its components. To support 5G slicing, monitoring must be comprehensive and encompass network slices end-to-end (E2E). Yet, several challenges arise with E2E network slice monitoring. Firstly, existing solutions are piecemeal and cannot correlate network-wide data from multiple sources (e.g., different network segments). Secondly, different slices can have different requirements regarding Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and monitoring granularity, which necessitates dynamic adjustments in both KPI monitoring and data collection rates in real-time to minimize network resource overhead. To address these challenges, in this paper, we present Monarch, a scalable monitoring architecture for 5G. Monarch is designed for cloud-native 5G deployments and focuses on network slice monitoring and per-slice KPI computation. We validate the proposed architecture by implementing Monarch on a 5G network slice testbed, with up to 50 network slices. We exemplify Monarch’s role in 5G network monitoring by showcasing two scenarios: monitoring KPIs at both slice and network function levels. Our evaluations demonstrate Monarch’s scalability, with the architecture adeptly handling varying numbers of slices while maintaining consistent ingestion times between 2.25 to 2.75 ms. Furthermore, we showcase the effectiveness of Monarch’s adaptive monitoring mechanism, exemplified by a simple heuristic, on a real-world 5G dataset. The adaptive monitoring mechanism significantly reduces the overhead of network slice monitoring by up to 76% while ensuring acceptable accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".