Heart Engineering of Photovoltaic Devices: Preparation of New Ru Dyes Using Thioindigo and Phenothiazine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Phenothiazine and thioindigo were used as substitutes to make new Ru dyes for DSSCs. The thioindigo unit is a notable molecule with strong technical qualities in these photosensitizers. As a result, research was done on the cyano substituent as an electron‐donating group. Both theoretical and experimental methods were used to assess the complexes' optical response. A better photovoltaic response is achieved by the cyano groups' efficient bonding with the semiconductor layer. Additionally, the complexes that were formed contain two different kinds of electron accepter substituents: cyanoacrylic acid and carboxylic acid, with efficiencies of 7.42% and 4.17%, respectively. Additionally, cosensitization was investigated and analyzed utilizing N719 and two generated complexes. DSSCs made with Complex 1 and 2 and N719 have corresponding efficiency percentages of 8.86% and 9.74%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".