MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403415719 · doi:10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.101008

Intersection of artificial intelligence, microbes, and bone and joint infections: a new frontier for improving management outcomes

2024· article· en· W4403415719 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Microbe · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierIntersection (aeronautics)Joint (building)Joint infectionsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceData scienceMedicineEngineeringGeographyTransport engineeringStructural engineeringSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the fast-evolving frontier arenas of technology and medical science, the convergence of artificial intelligence and machine learning with microbiology and surgery holds great promise for improved management of bone and joint bacterial infection outcomes.1,2 Bone and joint surgeries continue to increase worldwide, especially across Europe, Asia, and USA, with an estimated 5 million hip and knee prosthetic replacements performed worldwide in 2023 alone. Among these cases, periprosthetic and implant joint infections occur in up to 2% of primary surgeries and 5% of revision surgeries, resulting in substantial morbidity and health-care costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it