Symptom Network and Clusters of the Multidimensional Symptom Experience in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The symptom network can provide a visual insight into the symptom mechanisms. However, few study authors have explored the multidimensional symptom network of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify the core symptom and symptom clusters of patients with AF by generating a symptom network. Furthermore, we wanted to identify multiple characteristics related to symptom clusters. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. A total of 384 patients with AF at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital were enrolled. The University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale was used to assess AF symptoms. Network analysis was used to explore the core symptom and symptom cluster. RESULTS: Shortness of breath at rest ( rs = 1.189, rc = 0.024), exercise intolerance ( rs = 1.116), shortness of breath during physical activity ( rs = 1.055, rc = 0.022), and fatigue at rest ( rc = 0.020) have the top centrality for strength and closeness. The top 3 symptoms of bridge strength were shortness of breath at rest ( rs = 0.264), dizziness ( rs = 0.208), and palpitations ( rs = 0.207). Atrial fibrillation symptoms could be clustered into the breathless cluster and the cardiac cluster. We have identified multiple factors such as mental health status, left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure, sex, B-type natriuretic peptide, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as significant contributors within the breathless cluster, whereas sex, mental health status, and history of radiofrequency ablation were strongly associated with the cardiac cluster, holding promise in elucidating the underlying mechanisms of these symptoms. CONCLUSION: Special attention should be given to shortness of breath at rest as its core and bridging role in patients' symptoms. Furthermore, both the breathless and cardiac clusters are common among patients. Network analysis reveals direct connections between symptoms, symptom clusters, and their influencing factors, providing a foundation for clinicians to effectively manage patients' symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".