A Resource-Efficient Content Sharing Mechanism in Large-Scale UAV Named Data Networking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, there has been significant attention in UAV Named Data Networking (UNDN) from both industry and academia. This network paradigm adopts a “request-reply” communication model that allows UAVs to access desired content without the need for specific information regarding the geographical location or IP address of the content producer. This IP-independent design is well-suited for dynamic UAV swarms, but it presents challenges in establishing matching policies between content consumers and producers. This is because that during the distributed decision-making process in content sharing, consumers cannot possess private information regarding producers, and producers may lack the motivation to distribute content. As a result, a revelation and incentive mechanism is needed to be formulated in the system. In this paper, a resource-efficient content-sharing mechanism is proposed to address the aforementioned challenges. First, we propose a contract-based mechanism to incentivize content producers to share content and reveal their private information at the same time. The problem of obtaining the optimal contract is discussed in both cases of information asymmetry and complete information. Then, the Gale-Shapley (GS) algorithm is adopted to make a stable many-to-one matching between content consumers and content producers. The simulation results verify the feasibility, effectiveness and energy efficiency of the proposed mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".