Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Joint Caching and Routing in AI-Driven Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To reduce redundant traffic transmission in both wired and wireless networks, optimal content placement problem naturally occurring in many applications is studied. In this paper, considering the limited cache capacity, unknown popularity distribution and non-stationary user demands, we address this problem by jointly optimizing content caching and routing with the objective of minimizing transmission cost. By optimizing the routing with theroute-to-least cost-cachepolicy, the content caching process is modeled as a Markov decision process (MDP), aiming to maximize caching reward. However, the optimization problem consists of multiple nodes selecting caching contents, which leads to the combinatorial increase of the number of action dimensions with the number of possible actions. To handle this curse of dimensionality, we propose an intelligent caching algorithm by embedding action branching architecture into a dueling double deep Q-network (D3QN) to optimize caching decisions, and thus the agent at the controller can adaptively learn and track the underlying dynamics. Considering the independence of each branch, a marginal gain-based replacement rule is proposed to satisfy cache capacity constraint. Our simulation results show that compared with the prior art, the caching reward and hit rate of the proposed algorithm are increased by 35.3% and 33.6% respectively on average.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".