MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-Feature Fusion Based Sound Classification Algorithm

2024· article· en· W4403420874 on OpenAlexaff
Yuxuan He, Jingyi Su

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)FusionStatistical classificationPattern recognition (psychology)Sensor fusionInformation fusionFeature extractionSound (geography)AlgorithmSpeech recognitionAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban sound classification has a wide range of applications in noise analysis and monitoring systems. In order to solve the problem of low recognition rate of sound classification model under low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, on the basis of traditional sound classification fusion model, this paper proposed a new parallel hybrid model based on MGCC and CNN-BiLSTM fusion by making full use of the anti-noise performance of each feature extraction method. Firstly, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and Gammatone frequency cepstral coefficients were extracted from the preprocessed sound signals, and the two sound features were input into the Bi-directional Long Short- Term Memory Network combined with Convolutional neural network (CNN-BiLSTM) model as input to further extract deeper features. And the fusion features were obtained after the fusion of the two features. Finally, the fused features were input into a deep neural network for sound classification and recognition. The experimental results show that the accuracy of the proposed method on the Urbansound 8K dataset and the NoiseX-92 noise database can reach 98.4% and the accuracy on the noise dataset can also reach more than 89.6%. Experimental results show that the proposed method still has high recognition accuracy in low signal-to-noise ratio, and its performance is better than the traditional sound fusion recognition model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207