MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403421194 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2024.3473809

Deep Optimized Broad Learning System for Applications in Tabular Data Recognition

2024· article· en· W4403421194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceDeep learningArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Machine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The broad learning system (BLS) is a versatile and effective tool for analyzing tabular data. However, the rapid expansion of big data has resulted in an overwhelming amount of tabular data, necessitating the development of specialized tools for effective management and analysis. This article introduces an optimized BLS (OBLS) specifically tailored for big data analysis. In addition, a deep-optimized BLS (DOBLS) network is developed further to enhance the performance and efficiency of the OBLS. The main contributions of this article are: 1) by retracing the network's error from the output space to the latent space, the OBLS adjusts parameters in the feature and enhancement node layers. This process aims to achieve more resilient representations, resulting in improved performance; 2) the DOBLS is a multilayered structure consisting of multiple OBLSs, wherein each OBLS connects to the input and output layers, enabling direct data propagation. This design helps reduce information loss between layers, ensuring an efficient flow of information throughout the network; and 3) the proposed methods demonstrate robustness across various applications, including multiview feature embedding, one-class classification (OCC), camera model identification, electroencephalogram (EEG) signal processing, and radar signal analysis. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed models. To ensure reproducibility, the source code is available at https://github.com/1027051515/OBLS_DOBLS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it