Targeting IRE1α reprograms the tumor microenvironment and enhances anti-tumor immunity in prostate cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unfolded protein response (UPR) is a central stress response pathway that is hijacked by tumor cells for their survival. Here, we find that IRE1α signaling, one of the canonical UPR arms, is increased in prostate cancer (PCa) patient tumors. Genetic or small molecule inhibition of IRE1α in syngeneic mouse PCa models and an orthotopic model decreases tumor growth. IRE1α ablation in cancer cells potentiates interferon responses and activates immune system related pathways in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis reveals that targeting IRE1α in cancer cells reduces tumor-associated macrophage abundance. Consistently, the small molecule IRE1α inhibitor MKC8866, currently in clinical trials, reprograms the TME and enhances anti-PD-1 therapy. Our findings show that IRE1α signaling not only promotes cancer cell growth and survival but also interferes with anti-tumor immunity in the TME. Thus, targeting IRE1α can be a promising approach for improving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in PCa. The IRE1α-XBP1s pathway has been implicated in the regulation of anti-tumor immunity. Here the authors show that IRE1α is increased in prostate cancer (PCa) and that its inhibition reprograms the tumor microenvironment, promoting anti-tumor immune responses in PCa preclinical models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".