MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403422609 · doi:10.61473/001c.120468

Mapping local evidence on early recognition and management of people with potential cancer symptoms: a narrative review

2024· review· en· W4403422609 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Moodley, Sarah Day, Tasleem Ras, John E. Ataguba, Jane Harries, Zvavahera M. Chirenje, Bothwell Ghuza, Jennifer Nyawira Githaiga, Mary Kawonga, Suzanne E. Scott, Fiona M Walter

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth African Health Review · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeCancerNarrative reviewPsychologyMedicinePsychotherapistLinguisticsPhilosophyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim Early cancer detection has potential to improve outcomes. However, many patients in South Africa present when the disease is at an advanced stage. The World Health Organization recommends two approaches to early cancer detection: screening asymptomatic individuals, and early recognition and management of symptomatic individuals. This paper focuses on the latter. For people with potential cancer symptoms, the journey to diagnosis is complex and influenced by multiple factors. Most symptomatic people will self-present to primary health care clinics, where primary health care providers are pivotal in triage. Methods This article presents local insights into cancer awareness measurement tools: community-level cancer symptom awareness, lay beliefs, and symptom appraisal; factors influencing the journey from symptom discovery to diagnosis; primary health care provider challenges in assessing symptomatic individuals, and interventions to support symptom assessment and help-seeking. It draws on findings from the African Women Awareness of CANcer (AWACAN) project and a narrative review of relevant published articles on journeys to cancer diagnosis in SA (2013-2023). Findings Very few cancer awareness measurement tools have been locally validated, hampering comparison and limiting opportunities for intervention development and evaluation. The AWACAN study developed and validated a local cancer awareness measurement tool for breast and cervical cancer. Studies show that most people in SA need information on cancer risk, symptoms, and pathways to care. Barriers to accessing health care include financial, infrastructural, safety, stigma, and previous health facility experiences. Primary health care providers require support for symptom assessment and referral systems. There is limited local work on developing and evaluating interventions to improve timely cancer diagnosis. Conclusions This paper underscores the importance of prioritising early recognition and management of people with symptomatic cancer as part of a comprehensive cancer control plan, providing insights for improving the journey to diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouth African Health ReviewSame topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningFrench-language works237,207