MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403423323 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.155133

Effects of self-consistent extended Hubbard interactions and spin-orbit couplings on energy bands of semiconductors and topological insulators

2024· article· en· W4403423323 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Wooil Yang, Young‐Woo Son

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorea Institute for Advanced StudyCement Association of Canada
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsTopological insulatorSemiconductorPhysicsHubbard modelSpin (aerodynamics)Spin–orbit interactionTopology (electrical circuits)Quantum mechanicsSuperconductivityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A first-principles computational method with self-consistent on-site and intersite Hubbard functionals is able to treat local and nonlocal Coulomb interactions on an equal footing. To apply the method to understand solids with strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC), we have extended a pseudohybrid functional approach developed by Agapito-Curtarolo-Buongiorno Nardelli to implement self-consistent extended Hubbard energy functionals for noncollinear spin states. With this, energy bands of semiconductors with various SOC strengths such as Si, Ge, GaAs, GaSb, CdSe, and PdO are obtained, agreeing with results from fully relativistic $GW$ approximation (FR-GWA) as well as experiments. We also compute energy gaps of HgTe, ${\mathrm{CuTlS}}_{2}$, and ${\mathrm{CuTlSe}}_{2}$ and assign them to be topological insulators correctly, unlike characteristic failures for judging topological properties from typical hybrid functionals. We demonstrate feasibility of our method to handle large systems by computing surface bands of topological insulators, ${\mathrm{Bi}}_{\text{2}}{\mathrm{Se}}_{\text{3}}$ and ${\mathrm{Bi}}_{2}{\mathrm{Te}}_{3}$, with varying thickness up to eight quintuple layers. Considering its low computational cost comparable to conventional ab initio methods and improved accuracy to FR-GWA, we expect that our method provides an opportunity to study large-scale correlated systems with the strong SOC efficiently and reliably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207