MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

QUALITY OF LIFE AND COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEART FAILURE

2024· article· en· W4403428406 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zaur G. Zhilokov, Н. Г. Ложкина, Bataev Kh.M.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical & pharmaceutical journal Pulse · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeart failureCognitive impairmentQuality of life (healthcare)CognitionMedicinePsychologyCardiologyPsychiatryPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Вackground. Chronic heart failure (CHF) has a high prevalence in the Russian population. It is one of the main causes of reduced quality of life in cardiology patients due to the gradual progression of the disease and the development of complications, as well as the development of cognitive impairment. Early recognition of these disorders will optimize the management of patients with CHF. Purpose of the study. To evaluate the quality of life and cognitive functions in patients with different severity of chronic heart failure. Characterization of patients and methods of the study. 105 patients with confirmed diagnosis of CHF with different functional classes according to NYHA were included in the open cross-sectional non-randomized cohort study. Cognitive screening was performed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and quality of life was assessed by the Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D). Statistical Analysis Methods. Excel data analysis package and SPSS 23.0 data analysis package were used. Results and Conclusion. A pilot study was conducted to detect mild or severe cognitive impairment using the Montreal Cognitive Scale and quality of life using the EQ-5D questionnaire in patients with different functional classes of CHF. A significant correlation was found between cognitive function and left ventricular ejection fraction. Quality of life did not depend on the severity of CHF, sex, age, concomitant pathology. The obtained data should be taken into account in personalized management of patients with CHF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical & pharmaceutical journal Pulse→Same topicHeart Failure Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→