MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403428452 · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-76011-x

Author Correction: Fractional order memcapacitive neuromorphic elements reproduce and predict neuronal function

2024· erratum· en· W4403428452 on OpenAlexaffabout
P. Vázquez-Guerrero, Rohisha Tuladhar, Costas Psychalinos, Ahmed S. Elwakil, Maurice J. Chacron, Fidel Santamarı́a

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersDivision of Emerging Frontiers in Research and InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringOrder (exchange)Function (biology)Computer scienceNeuroscienceArtificial intelligenceBiologyArtificial neural networkEconomicsEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“National Institute of Health grant 1R01EB026939 and NSF-EFRI 2318139 to FS. CONACyT (Mexico) scholarship 625406 to PVG. Canadian Institutes of Health Research to MJC.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0850.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207