Plastocyanin and Cytochrome f Complex Structures Obtained by NMR, Molecular Dynamics, and AlphaFold 3 Methods Compared to Cryo-EM Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plastocyanin is a small mobile protein that facilitates electron transfer through the formation of short-lived protein–protein complexes with cytochrome bf and photosystem 1. Due to the transient nature of plastocyanin–cytochrome f complex, the lack of a long-lived tight complex makes it impossible to determine its structure by X-ray diffraction analysis. Up to today, a number of slightly different structures of such complexes have been obtained by experimental and computer methods. Now, artificial intelligence gives us the possibility to predict the structures of intermolecular complexes. In this study, we compare encounter and final complexes obtained by Brownian and molecular dynamics methods, as well as the structures predicted by AlphaFold 3, with NMR and cryo-EM data. Surprisingly, the best match for the plastocyanin electron density obtained by cryo-EM was demonstrated by an AlphaFold 3 structure. The orientation of plastocyanin in this structure almost completely coincides with its orientation obtained by molecular dynamics calculation, and, at the same time, it is different from the orientation of plastocyanin predicted on the basis of NMR data. This is even more unexpected given that only NMR structures for the plastocyanin-cytochrome f complex are available in the PDB database, which was used to train AlphaFold 3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".