Analysing the Environmental and Social Impacts of a Novel User‐Based Transit Signal Priority Strategy in a Connected Vehicle Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transit signal priority (TSP) is a traffic control strategy aiming at prioritising public transit vehicles at signalised intersections. The emergence of connected vehicles (CVs) provides the opportunity to enhance TSP operation, mitigating challenges such as the negative impact on nontransit users and the management of conflicting priority requests. Furthermore, traffic control policies produce environmental impacts, whilst TSP strategies are typically evaluated based on common traffic flow indicators, such as average vehicle speed, delay and/or the number of stops. In light of the recent progress made in CV technology, we propose and assess two user‐based TSP strategies. The first approach aims to minimise total user delay at a signalised intersection, whilst the second considers both reducing bus schedule delay and total user delay. We also measure the environmental effects of these TSP strategies. A microscopic simulation environment is used to compare the proposed methods’ performance against a conventional TSP ring‐and‐barrier controller in a case study involving two adjacent signalised intersections in Helsinki, Finland. The findings indicate that implementing the proposed strategies effectively enhances TSP performance whilst also lowering adverse environmental impacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".