MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403432490 · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c02495

Synthesis and Magnetic Properties of Spherical Maghemite Nanoparticles with Tunable Size and Surface Chemistry

2024· article· en· W4403432490 on OpenAlexaff
Sakina Meftah, Anh‐Tu Ngo, Laurent Bouteiller, V. Russier, David Hrabovský, Adama Konaté, D. Kondo, Fahmi Bédoui, Isabelle Lisiecki

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicIron oxide chemistry and applications
Canadian institutionsProcess Simulations Limited (Canada)
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMaghemiteNanoparticleThermal decompositionAlkylChemistryMagnetic nanoparticlesChemical engineeringDecompositionTransmission electron microscopyNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the synthesis of uniform populations of spherical maghemite nanoparticles by thermal decomposition of iron precursors with tunable diameters centered at 3.3, 7.5, and 12.0 nm and tunable surface chemistry. The three stabilizing ligands were fatty acids with three different alkyl chain lengths (18, 12, and 8 carbon atoms). The unprecedented accurate control of the surface chemistry is made possible by the use of three types of iron complexes, that is, iron oleate (C18), iron dodecanoate (C12), and iron octanoate (C8), associated with fatty acid ligands having the same alkyl chain length, that is, oleic acid (C18), dodecanoic acid (C12), and octanoic acid (C8). Since the thermal decomposition of the iron precursor varies with the chain length, no general rules can be applied to control the nanoparticle size, but optimal synthesis conditions have been investigated to induce the growth of nanoparticles with three different surface chemistries, keeping the diameters centered at 3.3, 7.5, and 12.0 nm. Finally, structural characterization of the nine populations of maghemite nanoparticles was performed by transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, and magnetic properties were determined by using SQUID magnetometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicIron oxide chemistry and applicationsFrench-language works237,207