MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403433096 · doi:10.1007/s00125-024-06275-5

Quantitative analysis of islet prohormone convertase 1/3 expression in human pancreas donors with diabetes

2024· article· en· W4403433096 on OpenAlexafffund
Paola S. Apaolaza, Yi‐Chun Chen, Kavi Grewal, Yannik Lurz, Severin Boulassel, C. Bruce Verchere, Teresa Rodríguez-Calvo

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetologia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersJDRFBreakthrough T1D CanadaHelmholtz Zentrum MünchenLeona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable TrustCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsProhormoneProhormone convertaseInternal medicineEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusBeta cellIsletInsulinType 2 diabetesType 1 diabetesMedicineHormoneProinsulinPancreasHyperinsulinemiaGlucagonBiologyInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Islet prohormone-processing enzymes convert peptide hormone precursors to mature hormones. Defective beta cell prohormone processing and the release of incompletely processed peptide hormones are observed prior to the onset of diabetes, yet molecular mechanisms underlying impaired prohormone processing during the development of diabetes remains largely unknown. Previous studies have shown that prohormone convertase 1/3 (PC1/3) protein and mRNA expression levels are reduced in whole islets from donors with type 1 diabetes, although whether PC1/3-mediated prohormone processing in alpha and beta cells is disrupted in type 1 diabetes remained to be explored. Herein, we aimed to analyse the expression of PC1/3 in islets from non-diabetic donors, autoantibody-positive donors and donors diagnosed with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Immunostaining and high-dimensional image analysis were performed on pancreatic sections from a cross-sectional cohort of 54 donors obtained from the Network for Pancreatic Organ Donors with Diabetes (nPOD) repository, to evaluate PC1/3 expression patterns in islet alpha, beta and delta cells at different stages of diabetes. RESULTS: Alpha and beta cell morphology were altered in donors with type 1 diabetes, including decreased alpha and beta cell size. As expected, the insulin-positive and PC1/3-positive areas in the islets were both reduced, and this was accompanied by a reduced percentage of PC1/3-positive and insulin-positive/PC1/3-positive cells in islets. PC1/3 and insulin co-localisation was also reduced. The glucagon-positive area, as well as the percentage of glucagon-positive and glucagon-positive/PC1/3-positive cells in islets, was increased. PC1/3 and glucagon co-localisation was also increased in donors with type 1 diabetes. The somatostatin-positive cell area and somatostatin staining intensity were elevated in islets from donors with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our high-resolution histomorphological analysis of human pancreatic islets from donors with and without diabetes has uncovered details of the cellular origin of islet prohormone peptide processing defects. Reduced beta cell PC1/3 and increased alpha cell PC1/3 in islets from donors with type 1 diabetes pinpointed the functional deterioration of beta cells and the concomitant potential increase in PC1/3 usage for prohormone processing in alpha cells during the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. Our finding of PC1/3 loss in beta cells may inform the discovery of new prohormone biomarkers as indicators of beta cell dysfunction, and the finding of elevated PC1/3 expression in alpha cells may encourage the design of therapeutic targets via leveraging alpha cell adaptation in diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetologiaSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207