MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403439638 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1503288

Editorial: Reviews in veterinary epidemiology and economics

2024· editorial· en· W4403439638 on OpenAlexaff
David C. B. Taras, Marta Canuti, Yogesh Chander, Camila Hamond, Dasiel Obregón

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVeterinary medicineEpidemiologyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interspecies transmission of virus is often the origin of emerging diseases in animals and humans, just recently corroborated by SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus H5N1. Our ability to prepare effective defense strategies and subsequently control such outbreaks depends on our capacity to predict which hosts might be susceptible to which known viruses. In this context Alberts et al. reviewed a highly diverse variety of machine learning algorithms and bioinformatic approaches that have been used between the years 2000 and 2022 to identify potential virus reservoirs on the basis of influenza and coronavirus genome data. The authors link the heterogeneity of approaches to their exploratory nature in a fast-developing research area of predictive modeling. They point out that data availability is a limiting resource and advise to consider sufficient specificity and quality of the data as a prerequisite for a thorough analysis.The increased implementation of new technologies in veterinary application in recent years is not limited to machine learning approaches but includes advanced mathematical modeling, e.g. in the form of probabilistic models such as Bayesian networks. Yusuf et al. reviewed the use of these and several other mathematical methodologies by digital clinical decision support (CDS) tools that aim at improving diagnostic and treatment decision-making. Based on studies published between 2017 and 2023 the authors recommend a methodological approach for the development of veterinary CDS tools in lower-and middle-income countries (LMICs), which includes the use of Bayesian algorithms and local expert knowledge. They believe that eventually, digital CDS tools can contribute to improved antimicrobial stewardship practices in areas of high need.Meletis et al. provided an overview of the most commonly used methods for probability estimation such as scenario trees, Bayesian belief networks, simulation methods, Bayesian prevalence estimation methods, and the STOC free model, which can all be used to substantiate freedom from infection based on surveillance data for the example of non-regulated infectious cattle diseases. By describing the variety of influencing factors and limiting assumptions for the choice of a method the authors aim to provide a guide for choosing an appropriate method in different settings. While currently, design and outcomes of heterogeneous control programs result in a lack of comparability, programs robust against differing modalities can be designed which outcomes are comparable, the so-called output-based surveillance. Reviewing the epidemiological and methodological considerations when designing a surveillance program in an output-based framework represents the second objective of the research.The two remaining articles in this Research Topic remain with cattle by looking at two epidemiologically important pathogens, Salmonella Dublin and Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis.Velasquez-Munoz et al. discussed the challenges posed by Salmonella Dublin, which can severely affect cattle and human health due to its multi-drug resistant characteristics. They stress the difficulties in controlling and eradicating S. Dublin from positive herds, as infection may persist in latent carriers and intermittently be shed into the environment, and provide an overview of the effectiveness of strategies that could be implemented in dairy facilities to prevent and control the disease. The review identifies gaps in the knowledge on regional prevalence estimation, on vaccines for calves, and on the economic impact of outbreaks.Griss et al. provided an overview on the association between Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection and the resulting economic burden of bovine paratuberculosis (PTB). They address the need for accurate estimates of the effects on production associated with the disease, a key requirement for evaluating the benefits of potential control programs. The need for more studies on the association between PTB and, particularly, fertility and meat production and on the associations of the different infection status and changes in productivity is highlighted. The authors point out the lack of studies from certain regions and on cow breeds other than Holsteins. Nevertheless, the authors conclude that evidence-based inputs for the development of economic models for bovine paratuberculosis impact estimations are available.Collectively, these papers underscore the importance of technology in shaping the future of veterinary epidemiology and economics. They highlight the potential of machine learning and digital clinical decision support tools in predicting, diagnosing, and managing infectious diseases. They also underscore the profound socio-economic implications of infectious diseases in animals, and the need for effective control and prevention strategies. However, much work remains to be done. We need to continue investing in research and development and ensure that the benefits of these advancements are accessible to all, regardless of their geographical location or economic status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0120.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207