MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403442598 · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.006

Batch-sizing and machinability data systems for milling operations: An optimal sustainable cost of quality approach

2024· article· en· W4403442598 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdulnasser El-Gaddar, Ahmed Azab, Fazle Baki

Bibliographic record

VenueManufacturing Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMachinabilitySizingQuality (philosophy)Process engineeringComputer scienceManufacturing engineeringEngineeringMachiningMechanical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, manufacturers make every effort to achieve a higher quality of their products at an attractive cost. With all the introduced legislation and incentives in the developed world to address global warming, machining shops in the West also strive to cut greenhouse emissions. This article offers an optimal approach to the micro Computer-Aided Process Planning (CAPP) problem to optimize the internal quality cost and buffering effect while keeping the environmental impact low. To optimize the machining parameters, the mathematical model is developed for different milling operations, face, side, and peripheral. cutting speed, feed rate, axial depth of cut, radial depth of cut, nose radius, and batch sizing while maximizing profit and meeting customer demand. A Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming (MINLP) model is formulated and solved using Classical Constrained Nonlinear Optimization (CCNO) and Genetic Algorithms (GAs). Surface roughness, used as a metric to evaluate the desired quality level of a finished machined part type, is modeled as a Gaussian random variable to model the surface roughness of the machined part utilizing a cumulative normal distribution. The ratio of rework and scrap is calculated in terms of the surface roughness of the machined part shifting away from the target and exceeding upper and lower specification limits. The internal failure cost model, addressing both scrap and rework, is developed based on Taguchi’s quadratic loss function. CCNO is employed to validate the results obtained by GAs, relaxing the lot-sizing integrality constraint and, thus, the convexity of the produced relaxed model. An iterative method employing a developed multi-regression model is used to solve for the expended power consumption (an inherent highly nonlinear environmental criterion of the developed model) within both GAs and CCNO. This study reveals that the machining parameters substantially impact the cost components of the objective function as well as the scrap and rework quantities. A stringent quality cost target can force the model to optimize the feed rate and nose radius to minimize the internal failure quality cost while improving the environmental impact, including direct and indirect power consumption and CO 2 emissions considerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManufacturing LettersSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207