MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403445521 · doi:10.47814/ijssrr.v7i10.2273

Hindu–Muslim Conflict in India: Causes, Consequences & Resolution

2024· article· en· W4403445521 on OpenAlexaff
Arshdeep Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Social Science Research and Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Conflicts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHinduismGeographyConflict resolutionAncient historyHistorySociologyReligious studiesSocial sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

India, renowned for its status as the world's largest democracy, is a richly diverse nation characterized by a multitude of ethnicities, languages, religions, and cultures. This diversity, while a source of national pride, also reveals profound fissures where historical grievances, socioeconomic disparities, and political aspirations intersect, fostering significant communal and ethnopolitical conflicts. The Hindu-Muslim conflict serves as a prominent example of such tensions, deeply rooted and shaping the socio-political fabric of the nation for centuries. This research paper investigates the origins and complexities of the Hindu-Muslim conflict by addressing three fundamental questions: What are the underlying causes of this persistent violence? Who bears responsibility for perpetuating these conflicts? And what practical and effective measures can be implemented to address and prevent their recurrence? To answer these questions, the paper employs a robust theoretical framework that synthesizes perspectives from sociology, political science, and conflict studies, with a primary focus on the instrumentalist approach to ethnopolitical conflicts. This approach highlights how political actors exploit ethnic identities and historical grievances for strategic gains. The study is underpinned by a detailed analysis of major case studies of communal violence, offering insights into the interplay between ethnic identity formation, historical legacies, and socioeconomic inequalities. The paper further examines the role of contemporary political elites in exacerbating tensions through strategic manipulation of communal identities and the politicization of cultural symbols. By exploring the dynamics of these factors, the research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the conflict’s origins and persistence. It also proposes actionable strategies for conflict resolution, including policy recommendations and community-based interventions, to foster long-term communal harmony and stability. Ultimately, this study contributes to the broader discourse on managing ethnopolitical conflicts by offering nuanced insights and practical solutions for mitigating violence and promoting peace in a diverse and complex societal context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Social Science Research and ReviewSame topicSouth Asian Studies and ConflictsFrench-language works237,207