MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403446087 · doi:10.1109/msmc.2024.3408415

Model-Based Systems Engineering Requires Metamodel Renovation: Requirements for Metamodel Renovation

2024· article· en· W4403446087 on OpenAlexafffund
Haibin Zhu, Sam Kwong, Imre J. Rudas, Edward Tunstel, Róbert Kozma, Peng Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Magazine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMetamodelingComputer scienceModel-driven architectureSystems engineeringConstruction engineeringEngineeringArchitectural engineeringSoftware engineeringUnified Modeling LanguageSoftwareProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ametamodel establishes the constructs and rules governing the creation of models within a specific modeling methodology, such as model-based systems engineering (MBSE), which has gained increasing popularity among researchers and practitioners. The absence of a universally accepted metamodel can lead to various issues, which have not been adequately addressed in the relevant literature. Drawing from practices in systems engineering (SE), this article identifies new challenges for MBSE, emphasizing the crucial need for a metamodel in its execution. Due to the generalization of MBSE, it is not trivial to provide a metamodel for MBSE, and solid work is needed to accomplish this task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.044
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.101
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0440.101
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.022
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0070.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics MagazineSame topicModel-Driven Software Engineering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207