MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403446571 · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2024.3481160

BrainForest: Neuromorphic Multiplier-Less Bit-Serial Weight-Memory-Optimized 1024-Tree Brain-State Classification Processor

2024· article· en· W4403446571 on OpenAlexafffund
Gerard O’Leary, Jamie Koerner, Mustafa Kanchwala, José Sales Filho, Jianxiong Xu, Taufik A. Valiante, Roman Genov

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringComputer scienceMultiplier (economics)State (computer science)Computer hardwareCoprocessorBit (key)Parallel computingArithmeticElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmArtificial neural networkMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Personalized brain implants have the potential to revolutionize the treatment of neurological disorders and augment cognition. Medical implants that deliver therapeutic stimulation in response to detected seizures have already been deployed for the treatment of epilepsy. These devices require low-power integrated circuits for life-long operation. This constraint impedes the integration of machine-learning driven classifiers that could improve treatment outcomes. This paper introduces BrainForest, a neuromorphic multiplier-less bit-serial weight-memory-optimized brain-state classification processor. The architecture achieves state-of-the-art energy efficiency using two layers of neuron models to implement the spectral and temporal functions needed for classification: 1) resonate-and-fire neurons are used to extract physiological signal band energy EEG biomarkers 2) leaky integrator neurons are used to build multi-timescale representations for classification. Sparse neural model firing activity is used to clock-gate device logic, thereby decreasing power consumption by 93%. An energy-optimized 1024-tree boosted decision forest performs the classification used to trigger stimulation in response to detected pathological brain states. The IC is implemented in 65nm CMOS with state-of-the-art power consumption (best case: 9.6µW, typical: 118µW), achieving a seizure sensitivity of 97.5% with a false detection rate of 2.08 per hour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and SystemsSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207