MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403447230 · doi:10.1109/tbc.2024.3475748

Optimized Canceling Signals for PTS Schemes to Improve the PAPR of OFDM Systems Without Side Information

2024· article· en· W4403447230 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingElectronic engineeringComputer scienceTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel blind partial transmission sequence (PTS) scheme to lower the peak-to-average-power ratio (PAPR) of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. Unlike existing PTS schemes in which the first sub-block (SB) is preserved as a phase reference for other SBs, we propose to add an optimized canceling signal (CS) to the first SB to further reduce the PAPR. The CS is designed such that they can be reconstructed by the receiver, and subtracted from the received signals before demodulation without requiring side information (SI). Since errors in reproducing the CS at the receiver can degrade the error performance, we design a novel CS protection mechanism specifically to protect the reconstruction of the CS. The proposed method is shown to significantly reduce the PAPR and symbol error rate (SER) without sacrificing the data rate due to using SI as many other existing PTS schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it