MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403453505 · doi:10.4000/12ht8

Les sources statistiques coloniales aux Archives nationales d’outre-mer

2024· article· fr· W4403453505 on OpenAlexaff
Amélie Hurel

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire & Mesure · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les sources conservées aux Archives nationales d’outre-mer offrent de nombreuses pistes de recherche pour étudier l’histoire de la statistique dans le contexte colonial français. L’étude des sources, tant de leur contenu que de l’historique de leur constitution, permet de dégager les traits saillants de l’utilisation et de la valeur accordée à la pratique statistique par l’administration coloniale dans les territoires colonisés par la France. Outil de gouvernance, de propagande, de surveillance ou encore de conception de politiques publiques, la statistique se déploie à travers une large gamme d’applications selon l’époque et les territoires considérés, interrogeant finalement sur les spécificités qu’elle revêt en contexte colonial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0190.046
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire & MesureSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207