MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403453813 · doi:10.1142/s1793830924501076

A polynomial-time exact algorithm for the connected k-facility location problem on trees

2024· article· en· W4403453813 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete Mathematics Algorithms and Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFacility Location and Emergency Management
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsTime complexityFacility location problemAlgorithmCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the Connected [Formula: see text]-Facility Location Problem (Con[Formula: see text]FLP) on trees. Let [Formula: see text] be an undirected tree, where [Formula: see text] is the [Formula: see text]-vertices set and [Formula: see text] is the [Formula: see text]-edges set. A facility set [Formula: see text] and a client set [Formula: see text] are given. Each client [Formula: see text] has one weight [Formula: see text] denoting the demand amount of [Formula: see text], and each facility [Formula: see text] has a weight [Formula: see text] denoting the opening cost at [Formula: see text], and each edge [Formula: see text], for [Formula: see text], is associated with a weight [Formula: see text] denoting the connection cost of it. When some facilities [Formula: see text] are opened, the overall cost involved in Con[Formula: see text]FLP includes three parts: the cost of opening facilities [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] times the cost of Steiner tree interconnecting all the opened facilities where [Formula: see text] is a fixed parameter, and the total connection cost of assigning each client to the closest facility in [Formula: see text]. The goal of Con[Formula: see text]FLP is to open at most [Formula: see text] facilities to minimize the overall cost, for a given input parameter [Formula: see text]. This paper focuses on the case of Con[Formula: see text]FLP on trees where [Formula: see text], and as a result presents a polynomial-time exact dynamic programming algorithm and a computational experiment to illustrate it. Furthermore, a simple way is shown to adapt the algorithm to the general case of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Finally, we apply the algorithm to a Con[Formula: see text]FLP instance in a regional tree-like water transportation network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it