MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403454624 · doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101335

Apixaban and Limiting Aspirin for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, and Multimorbidity

2024· article· en· W4403454624 on OpenAlexaff
Konstantin A. Krychtiuk, Renato D. Lópes, Daniel Wojdyla, Shaun G. Goodman, Ronald Aronson, Stephan Windecker, Roxana Mehran, Christopher B. Granger, John H. Alexander, Karen P. Alexander

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCanadian VIGOUR CentreUniversity of Alberta
FundersPfizerBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsAspirinMedicineAtrial fibrillationPercutaneous coronary interventionLimitingApixabanCardiologyInternal medicineAntithrombinsIntensive care medicineWarfarinRivaroxabanMyocardial infarctionHeparin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with multiple comorbidities are at increased risk for bleeding and ischemic events. Objectives: This post-hoc analysis of AUGUSTUS describes the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic regimens in patients with multimorbidity. Methods: inhibitor. Patients were categorized as having no multimorbidity (0-2 comorbidities), moderate multimorbidity (3-4 comorbidities), or high multimorbidity (≥5 comorbidities). The associations between multimorbidity and clinical outcomes and interactions with antithrombotic regimens were tested. Results: = 0.608). Conclusions: inhibitor in patients with AF and ACS/PCI, irrespective of the presence of multimorbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC AdvancesSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207