Intracardiac Echocardiography to Assist Anatomical Isthmus Ablation in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Patients With Ventricular Tachycardia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Successful catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) can be achieved by targeting 1 or more anatomical isthmuses. However, significant interindividual variability in the size and location of surgical patches means careful mapping is required to design ablation lines to block the isthmus. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) may assist ablation by accurate identification of individual TOF anatomy. Objectives: The authors hypothesized ICE-guided VT ablation improved isthmus recognition, ablation, and procedural outcomes. Methods: Retrospective study of adults with repaired TOF undergoing VT ablation between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022. ICE integration was compared to a strategy using electroanatomical mapping only to identify anatomic boundaries. All cases underwent ablation and had proven isthmus block as the procedural endpoint. Results: = 1.000). Conclusions: ICE improves ablation of the anatomical isthmus for sustaining VT in patients with repaired TOF by demonstrating the individual anatomy but does not improve long-term outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".