Short-time adaptive compact kernel distribution for fault diagnosis under variable working condition bearing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time-frequency distribution (TFD) methods are extensively employed in the diagnosis of bearings operating under variable working conditions. However, these methods often face high computational complexity, limited time-frequency resolution, and cross-terms. To address these issues, this paper presents a new approach called Short-Time Adaptive Compact Kernel Distribution (STACKD). Based on the characteristics of the vibration signals, we designed Chirp-modulated Gaussian Window and used them to segment the overall signal into small segments. Then, we used a two-step Bayesian optimization method to obtain adaptive compact kernel distributions (ACKD) for these small segments of the signal. Finally, we recombined the ACKD of these small segments into a global STACKD. Results from simulations and experiments demonstrate that STACKD offers improved robustness against interference signals, lower computational complexity, and higher time-frequency resolution without cross-term effects. This method is tailored for diagnosing rolling bearings under variable working conditions, providing enhanced visualization of diagnostic processes with superior time-frequency resolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".