Modelling the evolving critical state of crushable soils and parameter optimization with an improved genetic algorithm (AIS–RCGA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The critical state line (CSL) plays an essential role in the constitutive modelling of granular soils. It serves as a reference line for the measurement of the state parameter. The critical state of crushable soils cannot accurately be determined from experimental data because of the ever-changing soil properties due to particle breakage. In this study, two new parameters eB and eb are introduced, which account for the final position and the evolution of CSL of crushable soils during shearing, respectively. To identify the optimal CSL-related parameters from experimental data, a hybrid genetic algorithm combining artificial immune system (AIS) and real-coded genetic algorithm (RCGA), namely AIS–RCGA is adopted. The fitness is defined to minimize the prediction error of both void ratio (or pore water pressure) and deviatoric stress. We have refined the tuning methods for several hyperparameters of AIS–RCGA and proposed a novel method to assess the similarity of individuals within AIS–RCGA. Results show that the new method is more efficient in finding the global optimal for our problem. With optimized model parameters, the new constitutive model can accurately predict the response of crushable soil, outperforming other constitutive model reported in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".