MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403462359 · doi:10.18618/rep.e202442

Enhancing SRM Performance through Multi-Platform Optimization and FPGA-Based Real-Time Simulation

2024· article· en· W4403462359 on OpenAlexaff
Gustavo Xavier Prestes, Filipe Pinarello Scalcon, Babak Nahid‐Mobarakeh, Rodrigo Padilha Vieira

Bibliographic record

VenueEletrônica de Potência · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsTorqueEmulationComputer scienceHardware-in-the-loop simulationTorque rippleReal-time simulationTest benchPython (programming language)SimulationField-programmable gate arrayControl theory (sociology)EngineeringDirect torque controlEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a multi-platform algorithm methodology in order to define firing angles of torque sharing functions (TSFs) for the indirect torque control of switched reluctance motors (SRM) through a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) system. This proposal is used to achieve optimal levels of torque ripple and losses with accuracy and reliability, while taking advantage of real-time simulation. The analysis is performed assuming steady-state conditions of speed and torque reference for levels below the base speed, aiming to obtain firing angles ensuring optimal tracking performance. A novel methodology is proposed by using a grid search algorithm that handles the communication between Python, Code Composer, and the Typhoon HIL device. For that, an experimental data FPGA-based model with 500~ns of simulation time step is used to ensure highly accurate dynamic responses of current and electromagnetic torque. Moreover, controller-HIL (C-HIL) is used to have a safe and high fidelity testing environment, allowing rapid testing before transitioning to an experimental test bench. The simulation results are experimentally validated, demonstrating that the proposed strategy is effective and ensures optimal performance, taking into account peripheral systems of A/D, signal conditioning, PWM, and sensor emulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEletrônica de PotênciaSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207