Structural Integrities of Symmetric and Unsymmetric <i>trans</i>-Bis-pyridyl Ethylene Powders Exposed to Gamma Radiation: Packing and Electronic Considerations Assisted by Electron Diffraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Radiation detection (dosimetry) most commonly uses scintillating materials in a wide array of fields, ranging from energy to medicine. Scintillators must be able to not only fluoresce owing to the presence of a suitable chromophore but also withstand damage from radiation over prolonged periods of time. While it is inevitable that radiation will cause damage to the physical and chemical properties of materials, there is limited understanding of features within solid-state scintillators that afford increased structural integrity upon exposure to gamma (γ) radiation. Even fewer studies have evaluated both physical- and atomistic-level properties of organic solid-state materials. Previous work demonstrated cocrystalline materials afford radiation resistance in comparison to the single component counterparts, as realized by trans -1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene ( 4,4′-bpe ). To support the rational design of radiation-resistant scintillators, we have examined all symmetric and unsymmetric isomers of trans -1-( n -pyridyl)2-( m -pyridyl)ethylene ( n,m ′ - bpe, where n and/or m = 2, 3, or 4) solid-state crystalline materials. Experimental methods employed include single-crystal, powder, and electron diffraction as well as solid-state fluorimetry. Periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to understand the atomistic-level differences in bond lengths, bond orders, and packing. Electron diffraction was also utilized to determine the structure of a nanocrystalline sample. The results provide insights into possible trends involving factors such as molecular symmetry which provides radiation resistance as well as information for rationally designing single and multicomponent scintillators with the intent of minimizing changes upon γ-radiation exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".