Postoperative anticipatory anxiety between women and men in patients with spinal cord injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subtleties involved in the post-surgical recovery of people suffering from spinal cord injuries involve notable psychological issues that require further examination. (1) Background: people affected by spinal cord injuries may experience severe symptoms, as motor skill deficits, sensory processing irregularities, and pain, all of which can have a negative impact on their quality of life and mental health.; (2) Methods: we studied 264 patients hospitalized in the Neurosurgery Clinic 2 of the "Bagdar Arseni" Hospital for acute spinal cord injuries, in 2 groups of patients with and without CBT psychotherapy; (3) Results: we studied 97 women and 167 men; average anxiety was lower in women compared to men, showing a decreasing trend after psychotherapy for both sexes (4) Conclusions: we discovered that anticipatory anxiety after spinal cord injuries is high, especially in male patients. And psychotherapy brings benefits in reducing anxiety for both categories of patients, regardless of the age group they belong to.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".