MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403469096 · doi:10.5334/fce.294

Controlling Thermal Bridging as a Value-Added Technique to Enhance Energy Efficient Building Envelopes

2024· article· en· W4403469096 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Cities and Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridging (networking)ThermalEfficient energy useValue (mathematics)Environmental scienceComputer scienceEngineering physicsArchitectural engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringMeteorologyComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Buildings consume 30% to 40% of all primary energy worldwide and are responsible for 50% of total greenhouse gas emissions. Canada has set a target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% by 2050. The aim of this paper is to investigate thermal bridging in four high-efficient buildings, such as those built to LEED standards. Thermal bridging is a major source of heat loss in many buildings, manifesting itself through exterior envelopes, particularly through studs and wall systems. LEED is an evaluation system that rates how sensitive buildings are to the environment, with one of its main objectives being the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions through the implementation of highly efficient mechanical systems and the design of durable and efficient exterior wall systems with appropriate insulation. This research investigates and identifies the location of thermal bridging in high-efficiency buildings using nondestructive testing methods such as thermal imaging and THERM simulations. The study involves using infrared thermography to inspect surface temperature variations and detect irregular thermal patterns that correspond to thermal bridging. By collecting record drawings to identify the construction systems used in the external wall compounds, capturing thermal images with high-resolution infrared cameras, and comparing these images with simulation results, the research provides a comprehensive analysis of thermal performance. The findings from this research are significant, particularly in the context of window curtain walls, steel studs, brick shelf angles, timber frames, and roof hatches—all of which were identified as critical areas of concern due to their propensity to thermal bridges. For instance, window curtain walls, with their metal frames and large glass surfaces, showed temperature drops of up to 8°C. Steel studs, which are highly conductive of heat, resulted in temperature drops of up to 5°C, while brick shelf angles showed a temperature drop of 4°C due to heat conduction through the metal. In timber frame structure the building envelope connector showed temperature drops of up to 7°C. Additionally, roof hatches, necessary for rooftop access, were found to cause the most significant temperature drop of 10°C. The findings highlight the significant impact of thermal bridges on overall energy efficiency, emphasizing the need for careful design and construction practices to minimize heat losses. Addressing these thermal bridging issues is crucial for achieving the ambitious GHG reduction targets and enhancing the sustainability of high-performance buildings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it