Finite Theory: A Groundbreaking New Gravitational Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel gravitational model is proposed herein, offering a comprehensive explanation for various phenomena, including perihelion precession, light bending, and galactic rotation curves, without invoking dark matter, dark energy, or contravening energy conservation laws. Additionally, a robust adjustment to the mass and radius of the universe is introduced. An experiment aboard the International Space Station (ISS) is recommended to verify this model’s validity. Gravitoelectromagnetism (GEM) is employed at the macroscopic level to derive the aforementioned deductions. By conceptualizing both gravity and time dilation as particles, GEM can potentially facilitate antigravity propulsion through the generation of a gravitomagnetic field. The relative gravitomagnetic permeability exceeds the absolute one by a large factor, corroborated by domestic experiments and various entities, including the European Space Agency. In essence, this study presents a novel gravitational model and proposes multiple experiments to validate it. The implications of this model extend to future fields of study and technological advancements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it