MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403479571 · doi:10.3390/stats7040067

Preliminary Test Estimation for Parallel 2-Sampling in Autoregressive Model

2024· article· en· W4403479571 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStats · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAutoregressive modelEstimationTest (biology)STAR modelSampling (signal processing)Computer scienceStatisticsEconometricsMathematicsAutoregressive integrated moving averageEngineeringTime seriesGeologyComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the problem of estimation and testing the equality of two autoregressive parameters of two first-order autoregressive processes AR(1), where for each process, the observations are made at different time points. The primary interest is to propose the testing procedures for the homogeneity of autocorrelation parameters ρ1 and ρ2. Furthermore, we are interested in estimating ρ1 under uncertain and weak prior information about the possible equality of ρ1 and ρ2, though we may not have full confidence in the tenacity of this information. A large sample test for the homogeneity of the parameters is developed. Pooled “P” (or restricted estimator) and preliminary test “PT” estimators are proposed, and their properties are investigated and compared with the unrestricted estimator “UE” of ρ1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it