MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403484096 · doi:10.3390/siuj5050051

Burden of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)

2024· article· en· W4403484096 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ayun Cassell, Babacar Sine, Mohamed Jalloh, Stavros Gravas

Bibliographic record

VenueSociété Internationale d’Urologie Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperplasiaLow and middle income countriesMedicineDeveloping countryEconomicsEconomic growthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the leading cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) in men, with a histological prevalence that increases significantly with age. While extensive research on BPH has been conducted in high-income countries (HICs), limited information exists regarding its burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Understanding the prevalence, impact on quality of life, and management practices in these regions is crucial for developing effective healthcare policies and improving patient outcomes. Objectives: This scoping review aims to collate the existing literature on the burden of BPH in LMICs, focusing on prevalence rates, quality-of-life impact, and management practices. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview that informs healthcare strategies in resource-constrained settings. Methods: A scoping review methodology was employed, following the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. The review encompassed five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, and collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, was conducted using specific search terms related to BPH and LMICs. The inclusion criteria were studies conducted in LMICs (limited to SSA); reporting on the prevalence, impact, or management of BPH; and published in English. Results: The review included studies that reported the wide-ranging prevalence rates of BPH in LMICs, highlighting significant regional variations. The impact of BPH on quality of life was profound, with many men experiencing significant bother and reduced daily functioning due to LUTSs. The management practices in these regions often differed from those in HICs, with limited access to pharmacological treatments and surgical interventions. The economic burden of BPH in LMICs was also notable, with many patients facing financial barriers to accessing effective care. Conclusions: BPH poses a significant health and economic burden in LMICs, particularly in SSA. The prevalence of the condition is high, and its impact on quality of life is substantial. There is an urgent need for improved diagnostic and management strategies tailored to the resources available in these settings. Policymakers should consider integrating BPH management into broader healthcare initiatives to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the overall burden of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0110.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociété Internationale d’Urologie JournalSame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207