Select Probiotics Exhibit Antioxidative and Anti-Inflammatory Properties for Gut Modulation: In Vitro Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The gut microbiota harbors a complex ecosystem of bacteria that govern host health homeostasis. Alterations to the intestinal environment, known as gut dysbiosis, is associated with several diseases. Targeting the gut with microbiome-engineered therapeutics, such as probiotics, is a promising approach to restore microbial homeostasis and host health. Probiotics can effectively improve the gut environment, although strain-specific mechanisms remain largely unknown. Thus, this study aims to identify beneficial action of select probiotics to modulate the gut environment through antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties. To this end, we tested the interaction among three probiotic strains – Lactobacillus gasseri A237 (LgA237), Lactobacillus plan-tarum WCFS1 (LpWCFS1) and Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 5221 (Lf5221) – and a human intestinal epithelial cell line, HT-29, for adhesion properties, radical scavenging abilities and anti-inflammatory activities. All three probiotics adhere well to HT-29 cells, indicating proper gut colonization. LpWCFS1 demonstrated the greatest adhesion capacity (68.3%), followed by LgA237 (35.5%) and Lf5221 (25.9%). The probiotics also exhibit excellent antioxidant properties via DPPH radical scavenging activity, comparable to quercetin, a known and potent antioxidant. Moreover, LgA237, LpWCFS1 and Lf5221 decrease interleukin-8 expression in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-damaged HT-29 cells (41.19, 34.53 and 14.80% reduction, respectively), compared to non-treated cells. Further investigation of LpWCFS1 and LgA237 revealed a significant (p<0.0001) reduction in monocyte chemotactic and activating factor (MCAF) protein expression by 63.81 and 60.33%, respectively, in colitis-induced IECs. Overall, our results indicate adhesion, antioxidative and anti-inflammatory therapeutic potential of the tested probiotics through antioxidative and anti-inflammatory activities. These findings may be used to further understand the role of the tested probiotics in treating inflammation that underlies gut-related diseases. Such knowledge is essential for the development and translation of novel, targeted probiotic therapies to beneficially modulate the gut environment and reduce inflammation, improving host health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".