MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Macrogenetic Analysis of Isolation Mechanisms Reveals Habitat Fragmentation as the Primary Driver of Genetic Divergence in Mammals.

2024· preprint· en· W4403491115 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Danny Hancock, Patrick G. Meirmans

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMorphological variations and asymmetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut de Cardiologie de Montréal
KeywordsFragmentation (computing)Habitat fragmentationDivergence (linguistics)Isolation (microbiology)Evolutionary biologyHabitatGenetic divergenceBiologyGeographyEcologyBioinformaticsGenetic diversityDemographySociologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

jabbrv-ltwa-all.ldf jabbrv-ltwa-en.ldf Understanding the processes that drive spatial genetic differentiation is essential for understanding how populations adapt to environmental change. By evaluating the relative influence of these drivers, we can gain insights into evolutionary dynamics and the potential for species to respond to shifting landscapes. Three well-accepted drivers of spatial patterns in genetic variation are isolation-by-distance (IBD), where individuals are more genetically similar the closer they are geographically; isolation-by-environment (IBE), where gene flow is reduced due to selection against migrants in unsuitable ecological conditions; and isolation-by-resistance (IBR), where landscape features limit dispersal. We employed a macrogenetic approach, conducting a multi-species, multi-driver, meta-analysis of published genomic SNP data to identify general patterns driving spatial genetic differentiation of mammals globally. Three species distribution models were built per species to test different aspects of IBR, using combinations of landscape and bioclimatic variables. Using two model selection techniques, we find that landscape resistance models better explain genetic differentiation than bioclimatic resistance models. Among the three drivers, IBR was most frequently selected as the best model of genetic differentiation in mammals across both model selection tests, with IBD a close second and IBE the worst performing model. However, the importance of IBE increased with increasing spatial scale, with populations spread over larger distances more likely to be diverging due to IBE than IBR or IBD. Our findings suggest that anthropogenic habitat fragmentation significantly shapes genetic variation in mammals worldwide, underscoring the importance of mitigating the impacts of habitat fragmentation to prevent isolation and extinction of mammalian species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMorphological variations and asymmetryFrench-language works237,207