Adaptive Point Learning with Uncertainty Quantification to Generate Margin Lines on Prepared Teeth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During a crown generation procedure, dental technicians depend on commercial software to generate a margin line to define the design boundary for the crown. The margin line generation remains a non-reproducible, inconsistent, and challenging procedure. In this work, we propose to generate margin line points on prepared teeth meshes using adaptive point learning inspired by the AdaPointTr model. We extracted ground truth margin lines as point clouds from the prepared teeth and crown bottom meshes. The chamfer distance (CD) and infoCD loss functions were used for training a supervised deep learning model that outputs a margin line as a point cloud. To enhance the generation results, the deep learning model was trained based on three different resolutions of the target margin lines, which were used to back-propagate the losses. Five folds were trained and an ensemble model was constructed. The training and test sets contained 913 and 134 samples, respectively, covering all teeth positions. Intraoral scanning was used to collect all samples. Our post-processing involves removing outlier points based on local point density and principal component analysis (PCA) followed by a spline prediction. Comparing our final spline predictions with the ground truth margin line using CD, we achieved a median distance of 0.137 mm. The median Hausdorff distance was 0.242 mm. We also propose a novel confidence metric for uncertainty quantification of generated margin lines during deployment. The metric was defined based on the percentage of removed outliers during the post-processing stage. The proposed end-to-end framework helps dental professionals in generating and evaluating margin lines consistently. The findings underscore the potential of deep learning to revolutionize the detection and extraction of 3D landmarks, offering personalized and robust methods to meet the increasing demands for precision and efficiency in the medical field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".