MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403491284 · doi:10.3390/app14209486

Adaptive Point Learning with Uncertainty Quantification to Generate Margin Lines on Prepared Teeth

2024· article· en· W4403491284 on OpenAlexafffund
Ammar Alsheghri, Yoan Ladini, Golriz Hosseinimanesh, Imane Chafi, Julia Keren, Farida Chériet, François Guibault

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersInstitut de Valorisation des DonnéesKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsMargin (machine learning)Ground truthArtificial intelligencePoint cloudComputer scienceMetric (unit)OutlierBoundary (topology)Spline (mechanical)AlgorithmMathematicsMachine learningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During a crown generation procedure, dental technicians depend on commercial software to generate a margin line to define the design boundary for the crown. The margin line generation remains a non-reproducible, inconsistent, and challenging procedure. In this work, we propose to generate margin line points on prepared teeth meshes using adaptive point learning inspired by the AdaPointTr model. We extracted ground truth margin lines as point clouds from the prepared teeth and crown bottom meshes. The chamfer distance (CD) and infoCD loss functions were used for training a supervised deep learning model that outputs a margin line as a point cloud. To enhance the generation results, the deep learning model was trained based on three different resolutions of the target margin lines, which were used to back-propagate the losses. Five folds were trained and an ensemble model was constructed. The training and test sets contained 913 and 134 samples, respectively, covering all teeth positions. Intraoral scanning was used to collect all samples. Our post-processing involves removing outlier points based on local point density and principal component analysis (PCA) followed by a spline prediction. Comparing our final spline predictions with the ground truth margin line using CD, we achieved a median distance of 0.137 mm. The median Hausdorff distance was 0.242 mm. We also propose a novel confidence metric for uncertainty quantification of generated margin lines during deployment. The metric was defined based on the percentage of removed outliers during the post-processing stage. The proposed end-to-end framework helps dental professionals in generating and evaluating margin lines consistently. The findings underscore the potential of deep learning to revolutionize the detection and extraction of 3D landmarks, offering personalized and robust methods to meet the increasing demands for precision and efficiency in the medical field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207