Formulation and Solution of the Stochastic Truck and Trailer Routing Problem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In manufacturing and service industries, transportation often faces uncertain conditions. While current research on the truck and trailer routing problem (TTRP) mostly uses deterministic methods, they fall short in addressing uncertainties in travel and service times. This study aims to improve TTRP models by incorporating randomness in travel and service durations and specific time windows, better mirroring real-world scenarios. The enhanced model uses the multipoint simulated annealing (M-SA) method for practical application. The study involves 144 benchmark instances across six levels, starting with generating feasible solutions, then refining them using M-SA. A stochastic programming model with recourse (SPR) was used for problem formulation. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of various parameters and compared solutions obtained from M-SA and the analysis, showing minimal differences and thus the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in solving the stochastic TTRP. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it