MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403509228 · doi:10.1021/acsami.4c13199

Achieving High OER Performance by Tuning the Co/Mn Content in Prussian Blue Analogues

2024· article· en· W4403509228 on OpenAlexaff
Chang Wu, Jinsong Wang, Jiayang Li, Hang Zhang, Shailendra Kumar Sharma, Laura J. Titheridge, Campbell Tiffin, Yameng Fan, Lingfei Zhao, Weishen Yang, Zhengtao Li, Jian Peng, Jiazhao Wang, Aaron T. Marshall

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCopper-based nanomaterials and applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersMinistry of Business, Innovation and EmploymentMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsPrussian blueMaterials scienceNanotechnologyChemical engineeringElectrodePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for efficient, economical, and clean energy systems is increasing, and as a result, interest in water-splitting techniques to produce green hydrogen is also increasing. However, the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) hinders the practical application and widespread use of water-splitting technologies; therefore, to address this challenge, it is essential to develop cost-effective and efficient OER catalysts. In this work, we have synthesized an inexpensive and tunable FeCoMn Prussian blue analogue (PBAs) as an efficient OER catalyst via a straightforward process. The ratio of the Co and Mn to optimize the electrochemical performance, and as a result, the FeCo 0.41 Mn 0.42 PBA catalyst demonstrated the best electrochemical performance (260/304 mV overpotential at 10/50 mA cm –2, a low Tafel slope of 48 mV dec –1 and a good stability of 72 h at 10 mA cm –2 ). Additionally, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements and density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that the FeCo 0.41 Mn 0.42 PBA possesses the optimized electronic density distribution at the active site (Co), and the doping of Mn and Fe can not only increase the electricity conductivity but also activate the critical H 2 O deprotonation step.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicCopper-based nanomaterials and applicationsFrench-language works237,207