Investigating the association between the GAP-43 concentration with diffusion tensor imaging indices in Alzheimer’s dementia continuum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synaptic degeneration, axonal injury, and white matter disintegration are among the pathological events in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), for which growth-associated protein 43 (GAP-43) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) could be an indicator. In this study, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) GAP-43 clinical trajectories and their association with progression and AD hallmarks with white matter microstructural changes were evaluated. A total number of 133 participants were enrolled in GAP-43 and DTI values were compared between groups, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally with two and four-year follow-ups. Subsequently, the correlation between GAP-43 levels in the CSF and DTI values was investigated using Spearman’s correlation. The CSF level of GAP-43 is negatively correlated with the mean diffusivity measures in Fornix (Cres)/Stria terminals in early and late MCI (r s =-0.478 p = 0.021 and r s =-0.425 p = 0.038). Additionally, the CSF level of GAP-43 is negatively correlated with fractional anisotropy in the cingulum in late MCI (r s =-0.437 p = 0.033). Moreover, the axial diffusivity in superior corona radiate (r s =-0.562 p = 0.005 and r s =-0.484 p = 0.036) and radial diffusivity in superior fronto-occipital fasciculus was negatively correlated with GAP-43 level in the early and mid-MCI participants (r s =-0.520 p = 0.011 and r s =-0.498 p = 0.030). Presynaptic marker GAP-43 in combination with DTI can be used as a novel biomarker to identify microstructural synaptic degeneration in the early MCI. In addition, it can be used as a biomarker for tracking the progression of AD and monitoring treatment efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".