MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403510774 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3482193

Fault Detection for Lithium-Ion Battery Using Smooth Variable Structure Filters

2024· article· en· W4403510774 on OpenAlexafffund
Farzaneh Ebrahimi, Reza Hosseininejad, Mahmoud Al Akchar, Christian Brice Tongkoua Bangmi, Ryan Ahmed, Peyman Setoodeh, Saeid Habibi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersFedDev Ontario
KeywordsIonLithium (medication)Variable (mathematics)Computer scienceFault detection and isolationBattery (electricity)Materials scienceChemistryArtificial intelligencePhysicsMathematicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Batteries are prone to faults that may arise because of vibrations, deformations, collisions, or improper usage. These faults can be sorted into two main categories: internal and external faults. In this study, external battery faults, particularly sensor faults that affect the measurement of current and voltage, are investigated. This paper proposes a fault-detection strategy that is built on different variants of the Smooth Variable Structure Filter (SVSF) for the detection of such faults in a battery cell. SVSF is applied to estimate the State of Charge (SoC) and terminal voltage of the battery. A modified decision signal is calculated using the residual signals of the filters to detect faults using the Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) strategy. The performance of the SVSF is compared with that of the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated for detecting and isolating different external faults in a wide range of fault scenarios. The proposed SVSF-based methods not only improve fault-detection accuracy but also significantly decrease the fault-detection time in some scenarios compared to EKF, which is a critical factor for safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207